Recently at one of these classes, one person, let's call him Robert, asked about something that many of you Moore Weekly readers, should also understand. He asked, What are the differences between a traditional IRA and a Roth IRA and why should it matter to me?
I told Robert and the rest of the attendees that choosing between a traditional IRA and a Roth IRA can significantly affect long-term savings. So it is worth understanding the differences between them in order to make informed decisions. Let me explain to you what I explained to them.
You see, both traditional and Roth IRAs provide generous tax breaks, but its a matter of timing when you get to claim them. Generally, traditional IRA contributions are tax deductible on both state and federal tax returns for the year you make the contribution, while withdrawals in retirement are taxed at ordinary income tax rates. Roth IRAs provide no tax break for contributions, but earnings and withdrawals are generally tax-free. So with traditional IRAs, you avoid taxes when you put the money in. With Roth IRAs, you avoid taxes when you take the money out.
Therefore, it is important to consider whether your expected income, and resulting income tax, will increase or decrease in retirement.
Of course, its hard to predict what federal and state tax rates will be 10, 20 or even 40 years from now. But you can ask yourself some basic questions to think about your personal situation: Which federal tax bracket are you in today? Do you expect your income, which will include Social Security benefits, to increase or decrease in retirement?
Although conventional wisdom suggests that gross income declines in retirement, taxable income sometimes does not. Think about this. Once the kids are grown and you stop saving for retirement, you lose some valuable tax deductions and tax credits, sometimes leaving you with higher taxable income in retirement.
What about tax rates generally? I asked Robert whether he expects tax rates to be higher or lower when he retires based upon current fiscal and political policies? Higher he responded. That logic leads to the conclusion that Roth IRAs may be the better long-term choice.
Another consideration in choosing between a traditional IRA and a Roth IRA, which I explained to the attendees, is contribution limits. Anyone with earned income, who is younger than 70 1/2, can contribute to a traditional IRA. Roth IRAs, however, have income-eligibility restrictions.
Single tax filers, for instance, must have modified Adjusted Gross Income of less than $129,000 in 2014 to contribute to a Roth IRA. (Contribution limits are phased out starting at $114,000 in modified AGI, per IRS guidelines.) Married couples filing jointly must have modified AGI of less than $191,000 in 2014 in order to contribute to a Roth. (Contribution limits are phased out starting at $181,000.)
I explained to the class that another major difference between traditional IRAs and Roth IRAs is that traditional IRAs require minimum distributions (RMDs) beginning at age 70 1/2.
Roth IRAs, on the other hand, do not mandate withdrawals during the owners lifetime. So, if you dont need the money, Roth IRAs can continue to grow tax-free throughout your lifetime, making them ideal vehicles with which to transfer wealth. Beneficiaries of Roth IRAs do not pay income tax on withdrawals and can stretch distributions over many years.
Both traditional and Roth IRAs allow owners to begin taking penalty-free, "qualified" distributions at age 59 1/2. However, Roth IRAs require that the first contribution be at least five years before qualified distributions begin. Roth contributions (but not earnings) on the other hand, can be withdrawn penalty and tax-free any time, even before age 59 1/2.
I went on further to explain a few more things to consider when choosing between traditional and Roth IRAs. As mentioned above, contributions to traditional IRAs generally can lower taxable income in the contribution year, which lowers adjusted gross income, thereby making some additional tax incentives available, such as the child tax credit and/or the student loan interest deduction.
Another consideration for him is that up to $10,000 can be withdrawn from a traditional IRA without the normal 10 percent early-withdrawal penalty, if the funds are used to pay for qualified first-time homebuyer expenses. However, income taxes must be paid on the distribution, which can drastically eat away at the benefit. Five tax years after the first contribution, up to $10,000 of Roth earnings can also be withdrawn penalty-free to pay for qualified first-time homebuyer expenses.
Roth IRAs and traditional IRAs may seem like similar pieces to an investment plan, but making the correct decision is based on your specific strategy. Make sure you have all your questions answered before you make your move.
For answers to these questions contact Scott Moore, a Master
Advisor with Ed Slott and Company, at 770-535-5000 or click
here to schedule a no obligation initial consultation.
Questions? Comments? Ask David!
The content is developed from sources believed to be providing accurate information. The information in this material is not intended as tax or legal advice. It may not be used for the purpose of avoiding any federal tax penalties. Please consult legal or tax professionals for specific information regarding your individual situation. This material was developed and produced by radical promoting and their editorial staff based on the original articles written by jeff cutter in the falmouth enterprise. This article has been rewritten for David Gaylorand the readers of David's Family Finance. The opinions expressed and material provided are for general information, and should not be considered a solicitation for the purchase or sale of any security.